From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCullom v. Keen

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 7, 2021
21-01172 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2021)

Opinion

21-01172 BLF (PR)

09-07-2021

KEVIN L. MCCULLOM, Plaintiff, v. JHON KEEN, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

BETH LABSON FREEMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Chief Probation Officer “Jhon Keen” of the San Mateo County Probation Department. Dkt. No. 1. On June 28, 2021, the Court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend, to correct various deficiencies. Dkt. No. 7. Plaintiff was directed to file an amended complaint within twenty-eight days from the date the order was filed and advised that failure to respond would result in the dismissal of the action with prejudice for failure to state a claim without further notice to Plaintiff. Id. at 5.

The deadline, July 26, 2021, has long since passed, and Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint in the time provided. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim. The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McCullom v. Keen

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 7, 2021
21-01172 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2021)
Case details for

McCullom v. Keen

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN L. MCCULLOM, Plaintiff, v. JHON KEEN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Sep 7, 2021

Citations

21-01172 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2021)