From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCulloch v. California Franchise Tax Board

U.S.
Nov 23, 1964
379 U.S. 133 (1964)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.

No. 472.

Decided November 23, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 61 Cal.2d 186, 390 P.2d 412.

Walter L. Nossaman for appellant.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Dan Kaufmann, Assistant Attorney General, and Ernest P. Goodman and Harry W. Low, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellee.


The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


Summaries of

McCulloch v. California Franchise Tax Board

U.S.
Nov 23, 1964
379 U.S. 133 (1964)
Case details for

McCulloch v. California Franchise Tax Board

Case Details

Full title:McCULLOCH v . CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 23, 1964

Citations

379 U.S. 133 (1964)

Citing Cases

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Gavin

This conclusion is consistent with the decision of the California Supreme Court in a closely analogous case.…

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Commissioner of Rev. Ser

See District of Columbia v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 689 A.2d 539 (D.C.App. 1997); Augusta v. Kimball, 91 Me.…