Opinion
02-23-00075-CR
02-29-2024
Lyneisha Marie McCuin, Appellant v. The State of Texas
Do Not Publish Tex.R.App.P. 47.2(b)
On Appeal from the 372nd District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1771194R
Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Wallach, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Mike Wallach, Justice
A jury convicted Lyneisha Marie McCuin of the offense of murder and assessed her punishment at 35 years' confinement. The trial court sentenced her accordingly. We affirm.
McCuin's court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion, in which he avers that, in his professional opinion, the appeal is frivolous. Counsel's brief and motion meet the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744-45, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967), by professionally evaluating the appellate record and demonstrating why no arguable grounds for relief exist. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510-11 &n.3 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). Although McCuin filed a pro se response to the Anders brief, the State declined to file a responsive brief.
After an appellant's court-appointed counsel files a motion to withdraw on the ground that an appeal is frivolous and fulfills Anderss requirements, we must independently examine the record for any arguable ground that may be raised on her behalf. See Stafford, 813 S.W.2d at 511. Only then may we grant counsel's motion to withdraw. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82-83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 351 (1988).
We have carefully reviewed counsel's brief and the appellate record. We agree with counsel that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in the appellate record that arguably might support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827-28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court's judgment.