Opinion
Submitted May 25, 1934 —
Decided September 27, 1934.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam opinion is printed in 12 N.J. Mis. R. 365.
For the appellant, Osborne, Cornish Scheck ( Charles A. Malloy, of counsel).
For the respondent, David T. Wilentz, attorney-general, and Pierre P. Garven.
This case presents much the same kind of a record as that disclosed in Naples v. Civil Service Commission of New Jersey, 113 N.J.L. 426 , and for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in that case the judgment is affirmed.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.