From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCroskey v. Clarke

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 24, 2013
549 F. App'x 178 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-7558

12-24-2013

BENNY W. MCCROSKEY, Petitioner - Appellant, v. HAROLD CLARKE, Director of the D.O.C., Respondent - Appellee.

Benny W. McCroskey, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:13-cv-00168-MSD-LRL) Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Benny W. McCroskey, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Benny W. McCroskey seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion to compel. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order McCroskey seeks to appeal is not a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

McCroskey v. Clarke

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 24, 2013
549 F. App'x 178 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

McCroskey v. Clarke

Case Details

Full title:BENNY W. MCCROSKEY, Petitioner - Appellant, v. HAROLD CLARKE, Director of…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 24, 2013

Citations

549 F. App'x 178 (4th Cir. 2013)