From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCree v. Hudson

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Apr 3, 2009
CASE NO. 1: 08 CV 1210 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 3, 2009)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1: 08 CV 1210.

April 3, 2009


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


This matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge David S. Perelman. The Report and Recommendation (ECF # 12) is ADOPTED by this Court, and Petitioner's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct the sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (ECF # 1) is DENIED.

In February 2006, a jury found Petitioner guilty of aggravated murder with a firearm specification in violation of Ohio law. Petitioner was also convicted in a bench trial of having a weapon while under a disability. Petitioner is serving a sentence of life imprisonment for the aggravated murder conviction, with an additional three years for the firearm specification to be served consecutively. For having a weapon while under a disability, Petitioner was sentenced to five years of incarceration, to be served consecutively to the sentence for aggravated murder.

Petitioner filed this motion to vacate, set aside, or correct the sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on May 15, 2008, raising nine grounds for relief.

Pursuant to Local Rule 72.2, this matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Perelman for the preparation of a report and recommendation. On March 16, 2009, Magistrate Judge Perelman recommended that this Court deny the Petition. Petitioner has not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation.

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation de novo. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). The Court finds Magistrate Judge Perelman's Report and Recommendation to be well-written, well-supported, and correct. Therefore, the Report and Recommendation (ECF # 12) is ADOPTED in its entirety. Petitioner's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct the sentence is DENIED.

Further, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed.R.App.P. 22(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McCree v. Hudson

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Apr 3, 2009
CASE NO. 1: 08 CV 1210 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 3, 2009)
Case details for

McCree v. Hudson

Case Details

Full title:MAURICE McCREE, Petitioner, v. STUART HUDSON, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Apr 3, 2009

Citations

CASE NO. 1: 08 CV 1210 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 3, 2009)