From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCredy v. Woodcock

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 22, 1903
67 N.E. 1090 (N.Y. 1903)

Opinion

Argued May 8, 1903

Decided May 22, 1903

Percival S. Menken for appellant.

Frederic R. Coudert, Jr., and John P. Murray for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs, on authority of Hatch v. Central Nat. Bank ( 78 N.Y. 487); no opinion.

Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., GRAY, O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN and VANN, JJ.


Summaries of

McCredy v. Woodcock

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 22, 1903
67 N.E. 1090 (N.Y. 1903)
Case details for

McCredy v. Woodcock

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES A. McCREDY, Respondent, v . DANIEL WOODCOCK, as Attorney for…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 22, 1903

Citations

67 N.E. 1090 (N.Y. 1903)
67 N.E. 1090