McCredie v. Howard

3 Citing cases

  1. Bailey v. Beebe Medical Center, Inc.

    C.A. No. 03C-04-013 (Del. Super. Ct. Aug. 31, 2005)   Cited 3 times
    Denying the plaintiffs' request to recover pro hac vice admission fees as part of their court costs

    Law The law on the standard of review of jury verdicts is well-settled. I summarized it as follows in McCredie v. Howard, 2004 WL 1790120 (Del.Super.): "It is well established in Delaware that a jury verdict is presumed to be correct and just."

  2. Kesterson v. Royal Plus Electric, Inc.

    C.A. No. 05C-03-001 (Del. Super. Ct. Nov. 2, 2006)

    Remittitur or New Trial The law on the standard of review of jury verdicts is well-settled. I summarized it as follows in McCredie v. Howard, 2004 WL 1790120 (Del.Super.): "It is well established in Delaware that a jury verdict is presumed to be correct and just."

  3. McNatt v. Colonial School District

    C.A. No. 02C-09-237 JRJ (Del. Super. Ct. Aug. 4, 2005)   Cited 1 times

    Sweren v. Sheehy, 2001 Del. LEXIS 541 (Del.Super.).McCredie v. Howard, 2004 Del. LEXIS 265 (Del.Super.). Based on the foregoing, the Court awards costs to the Plaintiffs in the sum of $2,771.00.