From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCreary v. U.S.

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Dec 29, 2009
No. CV-09-01023-PHX-FJM, No. CR-04-00313-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. Dec. 29, 2009)

Opinion

No. CV-09-01023-PHX-FJM, No. CR-04-00313-PHX-FJM.

December 29, 2009


ORDER


The court has before it Derrick McCreary's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct the sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (doc. 4), respondent's answer (doc. 11), movant's reply (doc. 12), and a report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge recommending that the motion be denied (doc 13). Neither party objected to the report and recommendation and the time for doing so has expired.

After review, we accept the recommended decision of the Magistrate Judge pursuant to Rule 8(b), Rules Governing § 2255 Cases. The motion to vacate, set aside, or correct the sentence is denied.

We must issue or deny a certificate of appealability. Rule 11(a), Rules Governing § 2255 Cases. Movant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, the motion's denial is justified by a plain procedural bar, and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable. Moreover, briefing on whether a certificate should issue would not be helpful. Thus, we deny a certificate of appealability.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED DENYING movant's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct the sentence (doc. 4).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DENYING a certificate of appealability.


Summaries of

McCreary v. U.S.

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Dec 29, 2009
No. CV-09-01023-PHX-FJM, No. CR-04-00313-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. Dec. 29, 2009)
Case details for

McCreary v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:Derrick L. McCreary, Movant, v. United States of America, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Dec 29, 2009

Citations

No. CV-09-01023-PHX-FJM, No. CR-04-00313-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. Dec. 29, 2009)