From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCrea v. Ramirez

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 8, 2010
No. CIV S-10-0061 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-0061 GGH P.

December 8, 2010


ORDER


On February 12, 2010, plaintiff filed his consent to the jurisdiction of the undersigned (docket # 6). By order filed September 21, 2010, the court granted plaintiff twenty-eight days to file a second amended complaint. In the September 21st order, the court informed plaintiff of the deficiencies in his amended complaint. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

For the reasons given in the September 21, 2010, order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

DATED: December 7, 2010


Summaries of

McCrea v. Ramirez

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 8, 2010
No. CIV S-10-0061 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2010)
Case details for

McCrea v. Ramirez

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY B. McCREA, Plaintiff, v. D. RAMIREZ, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 8, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-10-0061 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2010)