Opinion
June, 1901.
Holt Duross, for appellant.
E.S. Hull, for respondent.
It appears by the testimony that the plaintiff's assignor fulfilled all his obligations under the written contract, while the defendant defaulted under his obligation to dispose of the $500 of stock for the personal benefit of the plaintiff's assignor. It is difficult to imagine how the learned court below could have reached a different conclusion.
Present: SCOTT, P.J., BEACH and FITZGERALD, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.