From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCray v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 11, 2000
769 So. 2d 1126 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

Case No. 4D00-2998

Opinion filed October 11, 2000 July Term 2000

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Peter M. Weinstein, Judge; L.T. Case No. 96-13581 CF10A.

Willie McCray, Graceville, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


The order denying appellant's post-conviction motion is hereby affirmed. Appellant entered a plea that provided for a specific sentence, with the understanding that the sentence was an upward departure from the 1995 sentencing guidelines. We agree with the trial court that appellant cannot now claim that his sentence was adversely affected by the amendment to the 1995 sentencing guidelines in order to qualify for resentencing under Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2000).

Appellant's claim of additional gain time must be raised in an appropriate administrative proceeding. See Allen v. State, No. 4D00-2103 (Fla. 4th DCA Sept. 13, 2000); Clements v. State, 761 So.2d 1245 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). Affirmance is without prejudice to do so.

DELL, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McCray v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 11, 2000
769 So. 2d 1126 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

McCray v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE McCRAY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Oct 11, 2000

Citations

769 So. 2d 1126 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)