From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCray v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
May 28, 2019
271 So. 3d 1245 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. 1D19-0015

05-28-2019

Bruce MCCRAY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Bruce McCray, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Bruce McCray, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Baker v. State , 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 2004). Petitioner is warned that any future filings that this Court determines to be frivolous may result in the imposition of sanctions, including a prohibition against any further pro se filings in this Court and a referral to the appropriate institution for disciplinary procedures as provided in section 944.279, Florida Statutes (2018) (providing that a prisoner who is found by a court to have brought a frivolous or malicious suit, action, claim, proceeding, or appeal is subject to disciplinary procedures pursuant to the rules of the Department of Corrections).

Makar, Osterhaus, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McCray v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
May 28, 2019
271 So. 3d 1245 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

McCray v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE MCCRAY, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: May 28, 2019

Citations

271 So. 3d 1245 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)