McCray v. Smith

Full title: CHRISTOPHE MCCRAY, and PENSAL MCCRAY, Plaintiffs, v. EDWARD ANTHONY SMITH…

Court: United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Feb 14, 2006

Civil Action No. 05-cv-02629-MSK-MJW (D. Colo. Feb. 14, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-cv-02629-MSK-MJW.

February 14, 2006

AMENDED ORDER DENYING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT JOHN LIESE TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

MARCIA KRIEGER, District Judge

THIS MATTER comes before the Court pursuant to Defendant John Liese's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiffs' Complaint (#32).

1. The Defendant has not complied with applicable provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the United States District Court for the District of Colorado Local Rules of Practice dated April 15, 2002, specifically, D.C.COLO.LCivR 6.1(D),

2. The Defendant did not submit a proposed order as part of the electronic filing, nor submit a proposed order in WordPerfect or Word format to chambers by electronic mail. Both acts are required by D.C. Colo. ECF Proc. V.L.2.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED, without prejudice.