From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCray v. New Jersey State Police

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE
Mar 1, 2012
Dkt. No. 23 (D.N.J. Mar. 1, 2012)

Opinion

Dkt. No. 23 Dkt. No. 25 Civil No. 10-2346 (RMB/JS)

03-01-2012

KAREEM McCRAY, Plaintiff, v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

THIS MATTER having come before the Court pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b); and

IT APPEARING that on January 17, 2012, United States Magistrate Judge Joel Schneider filed a Report and Recommendation in this case [Dkt. No. 25]; and

THE COURT NOTING that, on February 7, 2012, Plaintiff Kareem McCray was given, by order of the Court, until February 24, 2012, more than the fourteen days required under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 and L. Civ. R. 72.1(c)(2), to respond or otherwise object to this Report and Recommendation [Dkt. No. 26]; and

THE COURT NOTING that no objections having been received as of today's date; and

IT APPEARING, after review, that this Court should adopt Judge Schneider's Report and Recommendation without modification;

IT IS on this 1st day of March 2012, hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Report and Recommendation is adopted and entered; and it is further

ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.

________________________

RENÉE MARIE BUMB

United States District Judge


Summaries of

McCray v. New Jersey State Police

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE
Mar 1, 2012
Dkt. No. 23 (D.N.J. Mar. 1, 2012)
Case details for

McCray v. New Jersey State Police

Case Details

Full title:KAREEM McCRAY, Plaintiff, v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE

Date published: Mar 1, 2012

Citations

Dkt. No. 23 (D.N.J. Mar. 1, 2012)