From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCray v. Hawkins

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Nov 6, 2006
Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-377 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 6, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-377.

November 6, 2006


MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Plaintiff Willie James McCray, an inmate formerly confined at the Federal Correctional Complex in Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se, brought this Bivens-type action against Willie Hawkins, Joe Alonzo, Stacey Butler, and John Mirers.

See Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Earl S. Hines, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge recommends this action be dismissed without prejudice.

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available evidence. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation.


Summaries of

McCray v. Hawkins

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Nov 6, 2006
Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-377 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 6, 2006)
Case details for

McCray v. Hawkins

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE JAMES McCRAY, Plaintiff, v. WILLIE HAWKINS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas

Date published: Nov 6, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-377 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 6, 2006)