Opinion
No. 08-6495.
Submitted: August 21, 2008.
Decided: August 26, 2008.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Paul Trevor Sharp, Magistrate Judge. (1:06-cv-00984-PTS).
Donald Ivan McCray, Appellant Pro Se. Kari Russwurm Johnson, Cranfill, Sumner Hartzog, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Donald Ivan McCray appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McCray v. Chapel Hill Police Dep't, No. 1:06-cv-00984-PTS, 2008 WL 762260 (M.D.N.C., Mar. 19, 2008). We also deny McCray's motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
The parties consented to referral to a magistrate judge for final disposition under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).
AFFIRMED.