From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCray v. Chapel Hill Police Dept

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 26, 2008
289 F. App'x 605 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-6495.

Submitted: August 21, 2008.

Decided: August 26, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Paul Trevor Sharp, Magistrate Judge. (1:06-cv-00984-PTS).

Donald Ivan McCray, Appellant Pro Se. Kari Russwurm Johnson, Cranfill, Sumner Hartzog, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Donald Ivan McCray appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McCray v. Chapel Hill Police Dep't, No. 1:06-cv-00984-PTS, 2008 WL 762260 (M.D.N.C., Mar. 19, 2008). We also deny McCray's motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

The parties consented to referral to a magistrate judge for final disposition under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

McCray v. Chapel Hill Police Dept

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 26, 2008
289 F. App'x 605 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

McCray v. Chapel Hill Police Dept

Case Details

Full title:Donald Ivan McCRAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHAPEL HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Aug 26, 2008

Citations

289 F. App'x 605 (4th Cir. 2008)