From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCray v. Begor

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Nov 29, 2022
22-cv-03622-CRB (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-03622-CRB

11-29-2022

JAMILAH-MONIQUE MCCRAY, Plaintiff, v. MARK BEGOR. Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

CHARLES R. BREYER, United States District Judge

Plaintiff Jamilah-Monique McCray sues Mark Begor for breach of contract. See Compl. (dkt. 1). Begor moves to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). MTD (dkt. 12). McCray failed to file an opposition to the motion to dismiss and the Court ordered her to show cause as to why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). OSC (dkt. 15). Plaintiff was given until November 21 to show cause. Id. To date, McCray has neither filed a response to the order to show cause nor the motion to dismiss. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute based on Plaintiffs failure to respond to the pending motion to dismiss and the Court's order to show cause. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McCray v. Begor

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Nov 29, 2022
22-cv-03622-CRB (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2022)
Case details for

McCray v. Begor

Case Details

Full title:JAMILAH-MONIQUE MCCRAY, Plaintiff, v. MARK BEGOR. Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Nov 29, 2022

Citations

22-cv-03622-CRB (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2022)