From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCRACKEN v. EXXON/MOBIL COMPANY

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 16, 2009
CIVIL ACTION No. 08-2932 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 16, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 08-2932.

November 16, 2009


ORDER


AND NOW, this 16th day of November, 2009, upon consideration of Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (doc. nos. 7, 8, 12, 16, 55) and Plaintiff's responses thereto, it is ORDERED that said motions are GRANTED. For the reasons set forth in the attached Opinion, the unserved Complaints filed against Texaco and Hess Oil Company are also dismissed; however the claims against Texaco and Hess Oil Company alleging breach of warranty of merchantability are dismissed without prejudice.

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's four Motions for Leave to File an Amended Complaint (doc. nos. 29, 41, 44, 48) are DENIED and Defendants' Motions for Leave to File Reply Briefs in Support of Motions to Dismiss (doc. nos. 37, 38, 45) are DENIED as MOOT.

The Clerk's Office is ORDERED to mark this case closed.


Summaries of

McCRACKEN v. EXXON/MOBIL COMPANY

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 16, 2009
CIVIL ACTION No. 08-2932 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 16, 2009)
Case details for

McCRACKEN v. EXXON/MOBIL COMPANY

Case Details

Full title:TED A. McCRACKEN Plaintiff, v. EXXON/MOBIL COMPANY et al. Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 16, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 08-2932 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 16, 2009)