From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCoy v. Woodcraft Homes Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 6, 1973
42 A.D.2d 846 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

Opinion

August 6, 1973


In an assault action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant Mary Bennett appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered February 2, 1973, after a nonjury trial as is against her. Judgment reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interests of justice, and, as between the parties to this appeal, action severed and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The questions of fact have not been considered. In our opinion, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to require appellant to proceed with the defense of the action on the first day the case appeared on the calendar for trial, without counsel, after her counsel had withdrawn, and to deny her application for a 30-day adjournment to obtain new counsel. The case had been noticed for trial for the November, 1972 Term of the court and appeared on the trial calendar on January 15, 1973. Munder, Acting P.J., Latham, Shapiro, Gulotta and Benjamin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McCoy v. Woodcraft Homes Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 6, 1973
42 A.D.2d 846 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)
Case details for

McCoy v. Woodcraft Homes Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KELLY McCOY, Respondent, v. WOODCRAFT HOMES INC. et al., Defendants, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 6, 1973

Citations

42 A.D.2d 846 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

Citing Cases

Feuer v. Copley

The Supreme Court denied her request and proceeded to trial. Under the circumstances of this case, the…

Bonner v. State, ex Rel. Dept. of Transp

The appellate court reversed, holding that counsel should have been required to proceed relying on Delaware's…