From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCoy v. Terhune

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 8, 2005
Case No. CIV S-01-1218 WBS GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. CIV S-01-1218 WBS GGH P.

September 8, 2005

BILL LOCKYER, Attorney General of the State of California, JAMES M. HUMES, Chief Assistant Attorney General, FRANCES T. GRUNDER, Senior Assistant Attorney General, JAMES E. FLYNN, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, BARBARA A. MORRIS (SBN 137680), Deputy Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, Attorneys for Defendants Terhune, Baughman, Johnson, Pliler, Rosario, Chastain, Stiles, Martel, Kimbrell, Scarsella, Holmes, Andrade, Mini, Lynch, Advincula, Dunlap, Hamad, Jaffe, Kelly, Shoemaker, Clavere and Massey.


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' REQUEST TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 39-141


Having considered Defendants' request to file documents under seal and for an in camera review, brought under Local Rule 39-141, and good cause appearing, the Court grants Defendants' request and orders the Clerk of the Court to file under seal the documents submitted by Defendants for in camera review.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McCoy v. Terhune

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 8, 2005
Case No. CIV S-01-1218 WBS GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2005)
Case details for

McCoy v. Terhune

Case Details

Full title:EVERETT L. McCOY, Plaintiff, v. CAL A. TERHUNE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 8, 2005

Citations

Case No. CIV S-01-1218 WBS GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2005)