From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCoy v. Sacramento Cnty. Jail

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 27, 2023
2:22-cv-2182 KJM DB P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-2182 KJM DB P

01-27-2023

JEROME ELI MCCOY, Petitioner, v. SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL, Respondent.


ORDER

DEBORAH BARNES, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Petitioner, a pretrial detainee, filed a petition for it of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On January 12, 2023, this court recommended this action be dismissed without prejudice to its renewal as civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In a document filed January 19, 2023, petitioner seeks appointment of an investigator. That motion is premature because this court has recommended the petition be dismissed. If the district judge permits petitioner to proceed with this action, he may renew his request for an investigator.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion for appointment of an investigator (ECF No. 6) is denied.


Summaries of

McCoy v. Sacramento Cnty. Jail

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 27, 2023
2:22-cv-2182 KJM DB P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2023)
Case details for

McCoy v. Sacramento Cnty. Jail

Case Details

Full title:JEROME ELI MCCOY, Petitioner, v. SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jan 27, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-2182 KJM DB P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2023)