From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCoy v. Rosenblatt

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 22, 2008
304 F. App'x 175 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-6440.

Submitted: December 16, 2008.

Decided: December 22, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:05-cv-00480-WDQ).

Frankie L. McCoy, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Glenn William Bell, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; Thomas Patrick Turgeon, Adelman, Sheff Smith, LLC, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Frankie L. McCoy, Sr., appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McCoy v. Rosenblatt, No. 1:05-cv-00480-WDQ (D.Md. Mar. 17, 2008). We deny McCoy's motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

McCoy v. Rosenblatt

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 22, 2008
304 F. App'x 175 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

McCoy v. Rosenblatt

Case Details

Full title:Frankie L. McCOY, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard B. ROSENBLATT…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 22, 2008

Citations

304 F. App'x 175 (4th Cir. 2008)