From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCoy v. Kagel

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Feb 10, 2009
Case No. CIV-08-1028-M (W.D. Okla. Feb. 10, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. CIV-08-1028-M.

February 10, 2009


ORDER


On January 5, 2009, United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell issued a Report and Recommendation in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Magistrate Judge recommended the Court: (1) dismiss with prejudice Count I as to defendants Sergent Moore, Dr. Williams and "Nurse Kristel" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A(b) and 1915(e)(2)(B), (2) dismiss without prejudice Count II as to all defendants pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A(b) and 1915(e)(2)(B), and (3) dismiss with prejudice Count III as to all defendants pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A(b) and 1915(e)(2)(B). The parties were advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation by January 26, 2009. On January 15, 2009, plaintiff filed his objection only as to Count II alleging that defendant's use of improper procedures creates an inference of causation under § 1983. The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and plaintiff's objection, finds that plaintiff has alleged insufficient facts to create an inference of a causal connection between the actions of any party in this suit.

Upon de novo review, the Court:

(1) ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge on January 5, 2009;
(2) DISMISSES with prejudice Count I as to defendants Sergent Moore, Dr. Williams and "Nurse Kristel" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A(b) and 1915(e)(2)(B);
(3) DISMISSES without prejudice Count II as to all defendants pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A(b) and 1915(e)(2)(B); and
(4) DISMISSES with prejudice Count III as to all defendants pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A(b) and 1915(e)(2)(B).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McCoy v. Kagel

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Feb 10, 2009
Case No. CIV-08-1028-M (W.D. Okla. Feb. 10, 2009)
Case details for

McCoy v. Kagel

Case Details

Full title:DWAIN PAUL McCOY, Plaintiff, v. MR. KAGEL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Feb 10, 2009

Citations

Case No. CIV-08-1028-M (W.D. Okla. Feb. 10, 2009)

Citing Cases

Lewis v. Williams

Where a plaintiff claimed that he contracted a fungal infection due to the allegedly poor sanitation, this…

Lewis v. Williams

He does not claim that he actually contracted an infection or that he asked for a bandage to cover his…