From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCoy v. Fowler

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Sep 16, 2024
22-cv-12237 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 16, 2024)

Opinion

22-cv-12237

09-16-2024

Deonte' McCoy, Plaintiff, v. Nicholas Fowler, et al., Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

SUSAN K. DeCLERCQ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On August 15, 2024, Magistrate Judge Altman issued a report recommending that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 49) be granted. Neither party filed objections within the fourteen day period pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 72(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). They therefore have forfeited their right to appeal Judge Altman's findings. See Berkshire v. Dahl, 928 F.3d 520, 530-31 (6th Cir. 2019) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Moreover, there is no prejudicial clear error in the report.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 49) is ADOPTED. Further, it is ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgement (ECF No. 39) is GRANTED.

This is a final order and closes the case.


Summaries of

McCoy v. Fowler

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Sep 16, 2024
22-cv-12237 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 16, 2024)
Case details for

McCoy v. Fowler

Case Details

Full title:Deonte' McCoy, Plaintiff, v. Nicholas Fowler, et al., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Sep 16, 2024

Citations

22-cv-12237 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 16, 2024)