From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCoy v. Dep't of the Army

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 22, 2011
NO. CIV. S-09-1973 LKK/CMK (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2011)

Opinion

NO. CIV. S-09-1973 LKK/CMK

08-22-2011

ROSLYN McCOY, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and HONORABLE JOHN McHUGH, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, collectively, Defendants.


ORDER

On August 22, 2011, the parties filed a stipulation to continue the pretrial conference in this case. The pretrial conference is currently set for September 6, 2011, with pretrial statements due on August 23, 2011 and August 30, 2011. They have requested a four week continuation because plaintiff has recently substituted counsel, counsel for defendant is expecting the birth of a child, and the parties intend to engage in settlement discussions. The parties, however, request that the court not change the trial date set in this action.

Good cause found, the court modifies the scheduling order as follows:

(1) The pretrial conference in this case is continued to October 3, 2011 at 3:00 p.m.
(2) At the pretrial conference, the court will determine if the trial date in this case must also be continued.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LAWRENCE K. KARLTOON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

McCoy v. Dep't of the Army

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 22, 2011
NO. CIV. S-09-1973 LKK/CMK (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2011)
Case details for

McCoy v. Dep't of the Army

Case Details

Full title:ROSLYN McCOY, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 22, 2011

Citations

NO. CIV. S-09-1973 LKK/CMK (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2011)