From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCoy v. Carlson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
May 16, 2019
Case No. 3:17-cv-432 (S.D. Ohio May. 16, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 3:17-cv-432

05-16-2019

GARY L. MCCOY, Plaintiff, v. DR. RODNEY L. CARLSON, et al., Defendants.



Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. 87); AND (2) DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOCS. 61, 65, 67) AS MOOT

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (Doc. 38), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 87) is ADOPTED in full; and (2) Defendants' motions to dismiss the second amended complaint (Docs. 61, 65, 67) are DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: May 16, 2019

*s/Thomas M. Rose

Thomas M. Rose

United States District Judge


Summaries of

McCoy v. Carlson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
May 16, 2019
Case No. 3:17-cv-432 (S.D. Ohio May. 16, 2019)
Case details for

McCoy v. Carlson

Case Details

Full title:GARY L. MCCOY, Plaintiff, v. DR. RODNEY L. CARLSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: May 16, 2019

Citations

Case No. 3:17-cv-432 (S.D. Ohio May. 16, 2019)