From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCoy v. Carlson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Feb 25, 2019
Case No. 3:17-cv-432 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 25, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 3:17-cv-432

02-25-2019

GARY L. MCCOY, Plaintiff, v. RODNEY L. CARLSON, et al., Defendants.



Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

ORDER AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. 71)

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (Doc. #71), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) the Report and Recommendation (Doc. #71) is ADOPTED in full; and (2) Plaintiff's second motion for a declaration of completed service or for an extension of time to obtain service (Doc. #31) is DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: February 25, 2019

*s/Thomas M. Rose

Thomas M. Rose

United States District Judge


Summaries of

McCoy v. Carlson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Feb 25, 2019
Case No. 3:17-cv-432 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 25, 2019)
Case details for

McCoy v. Carlson

Case Details

Full title:GARY L. MCCOY, Plaintiff, v. RODNEY L. CARLSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Feb 25, 2019

Citations

Case No. 3:17-cv-432 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 25, 2019)