From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCoy v. Byrd

Supreme Court of California
Feb 28, 1884
65 Cal. 92 (Cal. 1884)

Opinion

         APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Tulare.

         The action was brought upon a contest originating in the State land office, concerning the rights of the parties to purchase a tract of swamp and overflowed land, and which was referred by the register of that office to the Superior Court for determination, under the provisions of section 3414 of the Political Code. The plaintiff set out in his complaint the terms of the affidavit made and filed by him upon his application to purchase, which failed to state whether there were or were not settlers upon the land. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and the plaintiff declining to amend, the defendant had judgment.

         COUNSEL:

         T. M. McNamara, A. J. Atwell, and Wm. H. H. Hart, for Appellant.

         Brown & Daggett, for Respondent.


         OPINION

          ROSS, Judge

         It is well settled that an applicant seeking to purchase land from the State must set out in his affidavit the facts required by the statute to be stated therein. ( Botsford v. Howell, 52 Cal. 158; Hildebrand v. Stewart, 41 Cal. 387; Woods v. Sawtelle, 46 Cal. 389.) The statute under which the plaintiff's application is made (Pol. Code, § 3443) requires the affiant to state, among other things, that he knows the land applied for and the exterior bounds thereof, and knows, of his own knowledge, that there are no settlers thereon; or, if there are, that the land has been segregated more than six months [3 P. 122] by authority of the United States. From the affidavit of the plaintiff it does not appear whether there are or are not settlers on the land which he seeks to purchase. The courts cannot hold immaterial, matters which the statute declares must be stated.

         Judgment affirmed.

         McKINSTRY, J., and McKEE, J., concurred.


Summaries of

McCoy v. Byrd

Supreme Court of California
Feb 28, 1884
65 Cal. 92 (Cal. 1884)
Case details for

McCoy v. Byrd

Case Details

Full title:O. S. McCOY, APPELLANT, v. PLEASANT BYRD, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Feb 28, 1884

Citations

65 Cal. 92 (Cal. 1884)
3 P. 121

Citing Cases

Chuck v. Quan Wo Chong & Co.

(Dewey v. Brown, 2 Pick. 387; Carpentier v. Small , 35 Cal. 346; Ord v. Chester , 18 Cal. 77.) A judgment for…

Sherman v. Wrinkle

The application of defendant was void, because it did not truly state all the facts required to be stated…