From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCoy v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Dec 1, 2010
Case No. 2:10-cv-01972-RLH-PAL (D. Nev. Dec. 1, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 2:10-cv-01972-RLH-PAL.

December 1, 2010


ORDER


This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's failure to file a Certificate as to Interested Parties as required by LR 7.1-1. The Complaint (Dkt. #1) in this matter was filed November 10, 2010. No Answer has been filed. LR 7.1-1(a) requires, unless otherwise ordered, that in all cases (except habeas corpus cases) pro se litigants and counsel for private parties shall, upon entering a case, identify in the disclosure statement required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships or corporations (including parent corporations) which have a direct, pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case. LR 7.1-1(b) further states that if there are no known interested parties, other than those participating in the case, a statement to that effect must be filed. Additionally, LR 7.1-1(c) requires a party to promptly file a supplemental certification upon any change in the information that this rule requires. To date, Plaintiff has failed to comply. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED Plaintiff shall file her Certificate as to Interested Parties, which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than 4:00 p.m., December 15, 2010. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed.

Dated this 30th day of November, 2010.


Summaries of

McCoy v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Dec 1, 2010
Case No. 2:10-cv-01972-RLH-PAL (D. Nev. Dec. 1, 2010)
Case details for

McCoy v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:LINDA R. McCOY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Dec 1, 2010

Citations

Case No. 2:10-cv-01972-RLH-PAL (D. Nev. Dec. 1, 2010)