From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCoy v. Alamu

Supreme Court of the United States
Feb 22, 2021
141 S. Ct. 1364 (2021)

Summary

vacating and remanding in light of Taylor even though the conduct at issue was likely not "particularly egregious"

Summary of this case from Caldwell v. Univ. of N.M. Bd. of Regents

Opinion

No. 20-31.

02-22-2021

Prince MCCOY, Sr., Petitioner, v. Tajudeen ALAMU.


On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of Taylor v. Riojas , 592 U.S. ––––, 141 S.Ct. 52, 208 L.Ed.2d 164 (2020) (per curiam ).


Summaries of

McCoy v. Alamu

Supreme Court of the United States
Feb 22, 2021
141 S. Ct. 1364 (2021)

vacating and remanding in light of Taylor even though the conduct at issue was likely not "particularly egregious"

Summary of this case from Caldwell v. Univ. of N.M. Bd. of Regents

instructing the court to reconsider an Eighth Amendment case "in light of Taylor"

Summary of this case from Villarreal v. The City of Laredo, Tex.
Case details for

McCoy v. Alamu

Case Details

Full title:PRINCE McCOY, v. TAJUDEEN ALAMU.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Feb 22, 2021

Citations

141 S. Ct. 1364 (2021)
209 L. Ed. 2d 114

Citing Cases

Green v. Padilla

In other words, in addition to asking whether the officer was theoretically on notice that they were acting…

Rosales v. Bradshaw

See Truman v. Orem City, 1 F. 4th at 1240. In other words, in addition to asking whether the officer was…