From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCormick v. McCaffray

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jan 1, 1899
25 Misc. 786 (N.Y. App. Term 1899)

Opinion

January, 1899.

Charles G. Cronin, for appellant.

Oppenheim, Leventritt Brennan, for respondent.


The claim of the plaintiff for his brokerage is measured by a percentage of 1 per cent. on the price at which the property was taken on the exchange, but what this price was does not appear from the proofs. The trial court evidently assumed it to be $60,000, and rendered judgment accordingly in favor of the plaintiff, but, as we have already stated, there was no evidence to support such assumption. The judgment must, therefore, be reversed.

Present: BEEKMAN, P.J., GILDERSLEEVE and GIEGERICH, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.


Summaries of

McCormick v. McCaffray

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jan 1, 1899
25 Misc. 786 (N.Y. App. Term 1899)
Case details for

McCormick v. McCaffray

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN McCORMICK, Respondent, v . CATHERINE T. McCAFFRAY, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Jan 1, 1899

Citations

25 Misc. 786 (N.Y. App. Term 1899)

Citing Cases

McCormick v. McCaffrey

Per Curiam. The evidence presented upon the trial below still fails to cure the omission which led to the…