McCormick v. Findling

Full title: LINDA McCORMICK Plaintiff, v. DAVID M. FINDLING, ET AL, Defendants

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Oct 4, 2005

Case No. 05-72165 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 4, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. 05-72165.

October 4, 2005

ORDER

VICTORIA ROBERTS, District Judge

On September 22, 2005, the Plaintiff filed the following Motions:

1. Motion for Rehearing to Compel Service of Pleadings on Plaintiff (Doc.51);

2. Motion for Rehearing of Verified Petition for TRO (Doc. 52); and

3. Motion for Rehearing to Strike Defendant Miechiels Answers (Doc. 53).

The Court will consider these as Motions for Reconsideration.

Plaintiff's Motions present the same issues already ruled on by the Court. Further, the Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate a palpable defect by which the Court and parties have been misled. L.R. 7(g)(3).

The Court will DENY these motions.

FURTHER, on September 22, 2005, the Plaintiff filed the following Motion:

4. Motion seeking leave of Court to File Motion for Clarification of Courts Order Dismissing Case (Doc. 54);

The Court will DENY Plaintiff's Motion. The Court's Order Granting Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #47) is clear.

IT IS SO ORDERED.