McCormick v. Bd. of Elections

3 Citing cases

  1. Griffin v. Burns

    570 F.2d 1065 (1st Cir. 1978)   Cited 191 times
    Holding that `due process is implicated where the entire election process — including as part thereof the state's administrative and judicial corrective process — fails to afford fundamental fairness'

    No opinion was filed with the April 27 order of the Rhode Island Supreme Court, but six months later the court issued a comprehensive written opinion. McCormick v. State Board of Elections, R.I., 378 A.2d 1061 (Oct. 20, 1977). The Rhode Island Supreme Court, with two of its five members dissenting, interpreted the absence of express reference to party primaries in the statute authorizing absentee and shut-in voting as a clear indication that such ballots were not legally authorized in primaries.

  2. Devine v. State of R.I.

    827 F. Supp. 852 (D.R.I. 1993)   Cited 5 times

    The Rhode Island Supreme Court had held that although the absentee and shut-in ballots had been distributed in accordance with past practice, there was no statutory basis for the casting of such ballots in a primary election. See McCormick v. State Board of Elections, 119 R.I. 384, 378 A.2d 1061 (1977). In my view, the record before the Court in this case does not provide the kind of specific evidence necessary for the Court to find, as a matter of fact, that the confusion surrounding the official Sample Ballots and the actual ballots affected the outcome of the election.

  3. Navedo v. Acevedo

    752 F. Supp. 523 (D.P.R. 1990)   Cited 11 times

    The Rhode Island Supreme Court ruled that there was no basis under Rhode Island law to allow absentee ballot voting in primary elections. McCormick v. State Board of Elections, 119 R.I. 384, 378 A.2d 1061 (1977). The results of the primary were reversed, and a new winner was designated.