Opinion
May, 1930.
Judgment and orders affirmed, with costs. Hinman, Acting P.J., Davis, Whitmyer and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur; Hill, J., dissents on the ground that there is a question of fact as to the contributory negligence of the plaintiff.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
McConville v. New York Central Railroad Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1930
229 App. Div. 821 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)
Summaries of
McConville v. New York Central Railroad Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1930
229 App. Div. 821 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)
Case details for
McConville v. New York Central Railroad Company
Case Details
Full title:ARTHUR F. McCONVILLE, Appellant, v. THE NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Date published: May 1, 1930
Citations
229 App. Div. 821 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)