From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McConnell & Malek Enters. v. Proof Mark, Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 23, 2023
3:23-cv-00010-LJC (N.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2023)

Opinion

3:23-cv-00010-LJC

01-23-2023

MCCONNELL & MALEK ENTERPRISES, Plaintiff, v. PROOF MARK, INC, Defendant.


ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION

RE: DKT. NOS. 11, 12

LISA J. CISNEROS, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The pro hac vice application of Attorney Stuart N Wilson Re: Dkt. Nos. 11, 12 is Denied for failing to comply with Civil Local Rule 11-3(a)(3). That rule requires the applicant's local cocounsel must be a “member of the bar of this Court”. While the application fee does not need to be paid again, the application cannot be processed until a corrected form is submitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McConnell & Malek Enters. v. Proof Mark, Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 23, 2023
3:23-cv-00010-LJC (N.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2023)
Case details for

McConnell & Malek Enters. v. Proof Mark, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MCCONNELL & MALEK ENTERPRISES, Plaintiff, v. PROOF MARK, INC, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 23, 2023

Citations

3:23-cv-00010-LJC (N.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2023)