From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McConico v. Dawson

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 20, 2007
No. CIV S-07-1342 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 20, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-1342 GEB KJM P.

November 20, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis.

Examination of the in forma pauperis application reveals that petitioner is unable to afford the costs of suit. Accordingly, the application to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).

Since petitioner may be entitled to relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, respondents will be directed to file a response to petitioner's habeas petition.

Petitioner has also filed a motion for the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted;

2. Respondents are directed to file a response to petitioner's habeas petition within sixty days from the date of this order.See Rule 4, Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. An answer shall be accompanied by all transcripts and other documents relevant to the issues presented in the petition. See Rule 5, Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases;

3. If the response to the habeas petition is an answer, petitioner's reply, if any, shall be filed and served within thirty days after service of the answer;

4. If the response to the habeas petition is a motion, petitioner's opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion shall be filed and served within thirty days after service of the motion, and respondents' reply, if any, shall be filed and served within fifteen days thereafter. Petitioner is advised that a failure to oppose any motion "may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . ." Local Rule 78-230(m);

5. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order together with a copy of the amended petition for writ of habeas corpus filed July 27, 2007 on Michael Patrick Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General; and

6. Petitioner's July 23, 2007 request for the appointment of counsel is denied.


Summaries of

McConico v. Dawson

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 20, 2007
No. CIV S-07-1342 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 20, 2007)
Case details for

McConico v. Dawson

Case Details

Full title:WAYNE L. McCONICO, II, Petitioner, v. N. DAWSON, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 20, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-07-1342 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 20, 2007)