From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCombs v. Saul

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 11, 2021
CIVIL 2:19-cv-02574-JDP (E.D. Cal. Jun. 11, 2021)

Opinion

CIVIL 2:19-cv-02574-JDP

06-11-2021

CRAIG MCCOMBS, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)

JEREMY D. PETERSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ECF No. 26 It is ordered that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees and expenses in the amount of four thousand dollars ($4, 038.92) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by Counsel Kelsey M. Brown (“Counsel”) in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). The Court will not entertain any future claims for EAJA fees and/or expenses in this civil action.

After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider the matter of Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees to Counsel (Dkt. 26-2). Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.

Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Counsel, pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Counsel.

This award is without prejudice to the rights of Counsel and/or Counsel's firm to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McCombs v. Saul

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 11, 2021
CIVIL 2:19-cv-02574-JDP (E.D. Cal. Jun. 11, 2021)
Case details for

McCombs v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:CRAIG MCCOMBS, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 11, 2021

Citations

CIVIL 2:19-cv-02574-JDP (E.D. Cal. Jun. 11, 2021)