From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCombs v. Prenosil

Supreme Court of Nebraska
Nov 20, 1987
415 N.W.2d 453 (Neb. 1987)

Opinion

Nos. 85-721, 85-1014.

Filed November 20, 1987.

Appeal from the District Court for Lancaster County: DONALD E. ENDACOTT and JEFFRE CHEUVRONT, Judges. Affirmed.

Barry L. Hemmerling of Jeffrey, Hahn Hemmerling, P.C., for appellant.

Robert R. Gibson of Professional Legal Associates of Nebraska, P.C., for appellee Elmer Prenosil.

John D. Ragsdale, for appellee Woodmen Accident and Life Company.

BOSLAUGH, WHITE, CAPORALE, SHANAHAN, and GRANT, JJ., and BRODKEY, J., Retired, and COLWELL, D.J., Retired.


The appellant's brief in these cases contains no assignments of error. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1919 (Reissue 1985) and the rules of this court, Neb. Ct. R. of Prac. 9D(1)d (rev. 1986), require that each error assigned shall be separately stated in an appellant's brief. In the absence of an assignment of error, the judgment will be affirmed, unless the court notes plain error on the record. Baggett v. City of Omaha, 220 Neb. 805, 373 N.W.2d 391 (1985).

Since the records in these cases fail to disclose plain error, the judgments are affirmed.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

McCombs v. Prenosil

Supreme Court of Nebraska
Nov 20, 1987
415 N.W.2d 453 (Neb. 1987)
Case details for

McCombs v. Prenosil

Case Details

Full title:GLENN E. McCOMBS, APPELLANT, v. ELMER A. PRENOSIL, APPELLEE. GLENN E…

Court:Supreme Court of Nebraska

Date published: Nov 20, 1987

Citations

415 N.W.2d 453 (Neb. 1987)
415 N.W.2d 453

Citing Cases

Haumont v. City of Lincoln

In the absence of an assignment of error, the judgment will be affirmed, unless the court notes plain error…