From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCollum v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 6, 2012
Case No. 10-11471 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 6, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 10-11471

12-06-2012

MELVIN MCCOLLUM, Plaintiff, v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER REMANDING TO FABRISTEEL PRODUCTS, INC.

Pursuant to this court's October 23, 2012 order, Plaintiff submitted a proposed order consistent with the Sixth Circuit's August 21, 2012 opinion. The Sixth Circuit concluded that Life Insurance Company of North America ("LINA") improperly rejected Plaintiff's claim for disability benefits but that Plaintiff was not clearly entitled to benefits because the plan administrator's decision was incomplete. (Opinion at 16, Dkt. # 42.) The Sixth Circuit "remand[ed] to the district court with instructions to remand to the plan administrator to provide a full and fair review." (Id. at 21.) Plaintiff's proposed order follows this direction.

Defendants object to the proposed order arguing that the Sixth Circuit mistakenly instructed that the case be remanded to the wrong entity. Defendants assert that the Sixth Circuit, this court, and Plaintiff all agree that Fabristeel Products, Inc. ("Fabristeel") is the plan administrator. (Id. at 17.) However, as the Sixth Circuit recognized, LINA reviewed Plaintiff's claim for disability benefits. (Id. at 16.) Defendants argue that LINA is the entity that reviews disability claims and that the case should be remanded to LINA instead of Fabristeel.

The court acknowledges the merits of Defendants' objection. LINA may be the appropriate party to complete a full and fair review of Plaintiff's disability claim, and remanding the case to Fabristeel might cause unnecessary delay in determining whether Plaintiff is entitled to benefits. However, the district court is bound by the Sixth Circuit's mandate that unambiguously instructs the court "to remand to the plan administrator." See Fort Gratiot Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v. Mich. Dep't of Natural Res., 71 F.3d 1197, 1202 (6th Cir. 1995) ("The customary procedure on remand creates a duty on the part of lower courts, which obtain jurisdiction after receiving the mandate of an appellate court, to obey the terms of the mandate and to carry it into effect."). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the case is REMANDED to Fabristeel Products, Inc., the plan administrator, to provide a full and fair review of Melvin McCollum's claim for disability benefits.

___________

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date, December 6, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

Lisa Wagner

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522


Summaries of

McCollum v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 6, 2012
Case No. 10-11471 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 6, 2012)
Case details for

McCollum v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am.

Case Details

Full title:MELVIN MCCOLLUM, Plaintiff, v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 6, 2012

Citations

Case No. 10-11471 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 6, 2012)