From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McClure v. Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Nov 7, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:16-CV-366 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. Nov. 7, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:16-CV-366 (MTT)

11-07-2016

WILLIAM JEFFREY MCCLURE, Plaintiff, v. Superintendent TIMOTHY JONES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Before the Court is the Order and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Stephen Hyles. (Doc. 12). The Magistrate Judge recommends denying the Plaintiff's motion for writ of mandamus (Doc. 6). The Plaintiff has not objected to the Recommendation.

The Court has reviewed the Recommendation, and the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. The Recommendation is ADOPTED and made the order of this Court. Accordingly, the Plaintiff's motion for writ of mandamus (Doc. 6) is DENIED.

The Recommendation points out that this Court lacks mandamus authority over the state officials the Plaintiff sued. (Doc. 12, at 2). In support, the Recommendation cites Moye v. Clerk, DeKalb Cty. Super. Ct., 474 F.2d 1275 (5th Cir. 1973). (In Bonner v. City of Prichard, the Eleventh Circuit adopted as binding precedent all Fifth Circuit decisions delivered on or before September 30, 1981. 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981).) In Moye, the Eleventh Circuit held that federal district courts lack "the general power to issue writs of mandamus to direct state courts and their judicial officers in the performance of their duties where mandamus is the only relief sought." 474 F.2d at 1276. (emphasis added). The text of the mandamus statute, however, makes clear that a district court also lacks mandamus authority over non-judicial state officials. See 28 U.S.C. § 1361 (extending district courts' mandamus jurisdiction only to "an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof"). Further, district courts have applied Moye's holding to non-judicial state officials. See, e.g., Church of Scientology of Ga., Inc. v. City of Sandy Springs, 843 F. Supp. 2d 1328, 1380 (N.D. Ga. 2012) ("Federal district courts do not have the authority to issue writs of mandamus to direct state officials in the performance of their duties."). --------

SO ORDERED, this 7th day of November, 2016.

S/ Marc T. Treadwell

MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

McClure v. Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Nov 7, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:16-CV-366 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. Nov. 7, 2016)
Case details for

McClure v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM JEFFREY MCCLURE, Plaintiff, v. Superintendent TIMOTHY JONES, et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

Date published: Nov 7, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:16-CV-366 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. Nov. 7, 2016)

Citing Cases

Phillips v. Ivey

Davis v. Lansing, 851 F.2d 72, 74 (2nd Cir. 1988) ("The federal courts have no general power to compel action…

Morris v. Ala. Supreme Court

"The text of the mandamus statute . . . makes clear that a district court . . . lacks mandamus authority over…