From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McClover v. Kingswood Management Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jul 6, 1945
185 Misc. 190 (N.Y. App. Term 1945)

Opinion

July 6, 1945.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, GUTMAN, J.

Jacob A. Salzman for appellants-respondents.

David A. Ferdinand for respondent-appellant.


MEMORANDUM


The testimony in behalf of the landlord presented a question of fact as to whether some major capital improvement had been made prior to November 1, 1943. It was error, therefore, to strike out the entire testimony. If major capital improvements were made prior to November 1, 1943, the provisions of clause (4) of subdivision (d) of section 4 of the Rent Regulation for Housing in the New York City Defense-Rental Area applied ( 8 Fed. Reg. 13915).

The judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law and new trial granted, with $30 costs to defendant to abide the event.

The appeal from the order denying summary judgment should be dismissed.

MacCRATE, SMITH and McCOOEY, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

McClover v. Kingswood Management Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jul 6, 1945
185 Misc. 190 (N.Y. App. Term 1945)
Case details for

McClover v. Kingswood Management Corp.

Case Details

Full title:HENRY McCLOVER et al., Plaintiffs, and LULA WADELL et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Jul 6, 1945

Citations

185 Misc. 190 (N.Y. App. Term 1945)
57 N.Y.S.2d 616