From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McClould v. Deboo

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 13, 2007
No. CIV S-07-1350 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 13, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-1350 LKK DAD P.

August 13, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner, a federal prisoner currently confined at the Federal Correctional Institution, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner has paid the filing fee.

Since petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, respondent will be directed to file an answer or a motion to dismiss.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondent is directed to file an answer or a motion to dismiss within thirty days from the date of this order. If an answer is filed, respondent shall include with the answer any and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the issues presented in the application.

2. Petitioner's traverse, if any, is due on or before thirty days from the date respondent's answer is filed; an opposition to a motion to dismiss is due within thirty days of service of the motion to dismiss;

3. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order together with a copy of petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on the United States Attorney.


Summaries of

McClould v. Deboo

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 13, 2007
No. CIV S-07-1350 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 13, 2007)
Case details for

McClould v. Deboo

Case Details

Full title:RUSSELL McCLOULD, Petitioner, v. KUMA J. DEBOO, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 13, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-07-1350 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 13, 2007)