From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCloskey v. Borders

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 3, 2018
NO. EDCV 17-1412-ODW (KS) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2018)

Opinion

NO. EDCV 17-1412-ODW (KS)

01-03-2018

ERIC McCLOSKEY, Petitioner, v. DEAN BORDERS, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ("Petition"), the Motion to Dismiss ("Motion") and related briefing, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"). The time for filing Objections to the Report has passed, and no Objections have been filed with the Court. Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Motion is GRANTED; (2) the Petition is DENIED; and (3) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. DATED: January 3, 2018

/s/_________

OTIS D. WRIGHT, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

McCloskey v. Borders

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 3, 2018
NO. EDCV 17-1412-ODW (KS) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2018)
Case details for

McCloskey v. Borders

Case Details

Full title:ERIC McCLOSKEY, Petitioner, v. DEAN BORDERS, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 3, 2018

Citations

NO. EDCV 17-1412-ODW (KS) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2018)