McClintock v. Roger's Cablesystems

1 Citing case

  1. Belcourt v. Anderson

    No. C4-96-615 (Minn. Ct. App. Sep. 17, 1996)

    Foreseeability in a legal duty analysis relates to the type of danger the alleged misconduct created, rather than the manner in which the harm occurred. McClintock v. Roger's Cablesystems, 478 N.W.2d 781, 784 (Minn.App. 1991). A parent does not have to have actual knowledge of facts making the harm foreseeable to have a duty to control her child's actions. Restatement (Second) of Torts ยง 316 (1965).