From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McClenton v. TDCJ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
Mar 14, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. C-11-403 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 14, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. C-11-403

03-14-2012

JAMES H. MCCLENTON, Plaintiff, v. TDCJ, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING

MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS

On February 22, 2012, United States Magistrate Judge Brian L. Owsley issued his "Memorandum and Recommendations to Dismiss" (D.E. 8). The Plaintiff was provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been filed.

When no timely objection to a magistrate judge's memorandum and recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge's memorandum and recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).

Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation (D.E. 8), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

______________________

NELVA GONZALES RAMOS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

McClenton v. TDCJ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
Mar 14, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. C-11-403 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 14, 2012)
Case details for

McClenton v. TDCJ

Case Details

Full title:JAMES H. MCCLENTON, Plaintiff, v. TDCJ, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

Date published: Mar 14, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. C-11-403 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 14, 2012)