From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McClennon v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION
Mar 6, 2018
Case No. 3:17-CV-546-JD-MGG (N.D. Ind. Mar. 6, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 3:17-CV-546-JD-MGG

03-06-2018

ANTHONY McCLENNON, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.


OPINION AND ORDER

Anthony McClennon, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging his prison disciplinary hearing in MCF 17-03-234 where a Disciplinary Hearing Officer (DHO) at the Miami Correctional Facility found him guilty of Possession or Use of a Controlled Substance in violation of B-202 on April 11, 2017. ECF 1 at 1. As a result, McClennon was sanctioned with the loss of 60 days earned credit time and demoted from Credit Class 1 to Credit Class 2. Id.

After McClennon filed his petition, the finding of guilt and sanctions were vacated. ECF 12-1. The Warden has filed a motion to dismiss because this case is moot. ECF 12. McClennon filed a letter with the court stating he is "in agreement" with the motion. ECF 14. Because the challenged disciplinary proceeding and sanctions have been vacated, this case must be dismissed. See Hadley v. Holmes, 341 F.3d 661, 664 (7th Cir. 2003) (prisoner can challenge prison disciplinary determination in habeas proceeding only when it resulted in a sanction that lengthened the duration of his confinement).

For these reasons, the motion (ECF 12) is GRANTED and the case is DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED on March 6, 2018.

/s/ JON E. DEGUILIO

JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

McClennon v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION
Mar 6, 2018
Case No. 3:17-CV-546-JD-MGG (N.D. Ind. Mar. 6, 2018)
Case details for

McClennon v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY McCLENNON, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

Date published: Mar 6, 2018

Citations

Case No. 3:17-CV-546-JD-MGG (N.D. Ind. Mar. 6, 2018)