From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McClendon v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Nov 2, 1966
407 S.W.2d 778 (Tex. Crim. App. 1966)

Opinion


407 S.W.2d 778 (Tex.Crim.App. 1966) Jack McCLENDON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 39825. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. November 2, 1966

No attorney of record on appeal for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

WOODLEY, Judge.

The offense is defrauding with a worthless check; the punishment, 240 days in jail and a fine of $500.

The record does not include a statement of facts adduced at the trial. No brief was filed in the trial court.

We note that appellant was not represented by counsel at his trial and his counsel on appeal has not been paid his fee and has become ineligible to represent appellant because he is now County Attorney of Lynn County, and has so advised appellant and this Court. No serious question as to the denial of right to counsel is presented, however, because the record reflects that after hearing the trial judge found that appellant was not indigent but was able to employ counsel if he saw fit to do so.

No error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

McClendon v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Nov 2, 1966
407 S.W.2d 778 (Tex. Crim. App. 1966)
Case details for

McClendon v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jack McCLENDON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Nov 2, 1966

Citations

407 S.W.2d 778 (Tex. Crim. App. 1966)

Citing Cases

Butler v. State

However, it is also well settled that a court is under no duty to appoint counsel in the absence of a showing…

Barbee v. State

Nor, for the same reason, was he entitled to the appointment of counsel, under Art. 26.04, C.C.P., in a…