From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McClendon v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Sep 9, 2021
No. 2024-21S (U.S.T.C. Sep. 9, 2021)

Opinion

2024-21S

09-09-2021

Deviet A. McClendon Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


ORDER

Maurice B. Foley, Chief Judge.

On August 20, 2021, the parties filed a Joint Proposed Stipulated Decision and a Joint Settlement Stipulation. Petitioner's then-counsel, Patrick W. Thomas, signed each of these documents on behalf of petitioner.

Thereafter, on September 2, 2021, David R. Pruitt filed a Substitution of Counsel, substituting himself for Mr. Thomas. In view of the fact that neither the proposed decision nor the settlement stipulation bears the original signature of petitioner's current counsel, Mr. Pruitt, as required under Rule 23(a)(3) of the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, we will strike the aforementioned filings as set forth below.

Upon due consideration and for cause, it is

ORDERED that the parties' Joint Proposed Stipulated Decision, and Joint Settlement Stipulation, filed August 20, 2021, are hereby deemed stricken from the Court's record in this case. It is further

ORDERED that, on or before October 1, 2021, the parties shall file a revised Joint Proposed Stipulated Decision and a revised Joint Settlement Stipulation.

1


Summaries of

McClendon v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Sep 9, 2021
No. 2024-21S (U.S.T.C. Sep. 9, 2021)
Case details for

McClendon v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Deviet A. McClendon Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Sep 9, 2021

Citations

No. 2024-21S (U.S.T.C. Sep. 9, 2021)