From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McClendon v. Beasley

United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia
Jun 26, 2023
Civil Action 7:22-CV-99-WLS-TQL (M.D. Ga. Jun. 26, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 7:22-CV-99-WLS-TQL

06-26-2023

BRIAN EARL MCCLENDON, Plaintiff, v. JACOB BEASLEY, et al., Defendants.

Brian Earl McClendon Plaintiff pro se Christopher M. Carr Attorney General Loretta L. Pinkston-Pope Deputy Attorney General Roger A. Chalmers Senior Assistant Attorney General Jason S. Knowles Assistant Attorney General State Law Department Counsel for Defendants


Brian Earl McClendon Plaintiff pro se

Christopher M. Carr Attorney General Loretta L. Pinkston-Pope Deputy Attorney General Roger A. Chalmers Senior Assistant Attorney General

Jason S. Knowles Assistant Attorney General State Law Department Counsel for Defendants

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1), Plaintiff Brian Earl McClendon and Defendants stipulate that the above-styled action be dismissed with prejudice. The parties shall bear their own costs.

Respectfully submitted,


Summaries of

McClendon v. Beasley

United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia
Jun 26, 2023
Civil Action 7:22-CV-99-WLS-TQL (M.D. Ga. Jun. 26, 2023)
Case details for

McClendon v. Beasley

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN EARL MCCLENDON, Plaintiff, v. JACOB BEASLEY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia

Date published: Jun 26, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 7:22-CV-99-WLS-TQL (M.D. Ga. Jun. 26, 2023)